Activities
Divisions
Performances
Activities
Divisions
Performances
'Elon Musk's claims are disjointed and delusional': OpenAI disputes former investor's lawsuit
In response to the legal action taken by Elon Musk, OpenAI argued that it is rooted in a fabricated, complicated, and frequently disjointed set of facts. OpenAI further suggested in the legal document that Musk might leverage the lawsuit to gain access to their proprietary records and technology during the pretrial investigation.
OpenAI has vehemently denied Elon Musk's accusations in a legal document, portraying his assertions as based on complex and frequently inconsistent facts. This rebuttal signifies the company's initial legal response to Musk's lawsuit filed in February, as per CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman.
Musk's legal action alleges that OpenAI has strayed from its original goal of creating accountable artificial intelligence due to the excessive influence from its primary investor, Microsoft Corporation. In response, OpenAI stated in its legal documents that it had not violated any contract with Musk, arguing that there was no founding contract or any form of agreement with him.
The submission also dismissed the assertions Musk made in a note to his team and a recent blog article. OpenAI portrayed Musk's demanded resolution as exceptional and grounded on an imaginary agreement. The firm maintained that Musk's objective was to force OpenAI to restructure and share its technology based on his envisioned conditions.
The disagreement between Musk and OpenAI has a history that goes back further than the lawsuit, and it mainly concerns disputes over the company's commercial approach and its ties with Microsoft. Musk, who was originally part of the founding team of OpenAI, has expressed dissatisfaction with the company's course.
OpenAI disclosed in a blog post that Musk had earlier proposed merging the company with Tesla Inc., his car manufacturing business. The document also hinted that Musk was in favor of OpenAI functioning as a profit-making organization, but only under his supervision. OpenAI's legal department alleged Musk of intending to exploit the company's tech advancements for his personal gain.
The continuing conflict between Musk and OpenAI brings up important issues regarding AI safety and availability, reaching far beyond the technology sector. Vinod Khosla, a billionaire entrepreneur and investor in OpenAI, shared his views, implying that Musk's legal action would not contribute to the creation of artificial general intelligence via legal pathways.
OpenAI expressed in the legal document that they worry Musk might exploit the lawsuit to obtain the firm's confidential files and tech via pretrial discovery. To safeguard against this, the organization asked the court to categorize the case as "complex" due to its sophisticated technical aspects and the possible participation of various parties and allegations.
(Incorporating information from various sources)
Look for us on YouTube
Top Programmes
Connected Narratives
OpenAI's Sora has the ability to create convincing nude videos, with developers urgently working on a solution
Musk communicates that his ketamine use benefits shareholders: An explanation of this substance and its safety
Musk confesses to using Ketamine as a means to evade 'negativity', asserts it's advantageous for Tesla investors
Research reveals that hackers can effortlessly interpret your conversations with ChatGPT and other AI services
OpenAI's Sora has the ability to generate believable nude videos, and developers are racing to implement a fix
Musk believes his consumption of ketamine is beneficial for stakeholders: Unpacking the nature and safety of this drug
Musk acknowledges the use of Ketamine to sidestep 'negativity', and asserts it's lucrative for Tesla's investors
A study shows that hackers can smoothly understand your interactions with ChatGPT, among other AI platforms
is available on YouTube.
Firstpost reserves all rights, copyright © 2024.
+ There are no comments
Add yours