Activities
Divisions
Performances
Activities
Divisions
Performances
'Elon Musk is disjointed, deluded': OpenAI disputes former investor's legal action
In reply to Elon Musk's lawsuit, OpenAI has asserted that the basis of it is imagined, complicated, and frequently disjointed in terms of facts. According to the legal documents, OpenAI also suggested that Musk might take advantage of the lawsuit to obtain the company's confidential information and technology through the pretrial exploration process.
OpenAI has vehemently denied Elon Musk's accusations in a legal document, stating that his assertions are based on complicated and frequently illogical facts. The company's CEO, Sam Altman, and President, Greg Brockman, have indicated that this is the company's initial legal rebuttal to Musk's lawsuit filed in February.
The lawsuit filed by Musk alleges that OpenAI has strayed from its original mission to create ethical artificial intelligence, and is now unduly swayed by its primary investor, Microsoft Corporation. In response, OpenAI stated in its legal documents that it did not violate any contracts with Musk, as there were no original contracts or any sort of agreements in place with him.
The submission also dismissed assertions made by Musk in a staff memo and a recent blog article. OpenAI described Musk's desired remedy as exceptional and founded on a non-existent agreement. The firm maintained that Musk's goal was to force OpenAI to restructure and share its technology as per his envisioned conditions.
The disagreement between Musk and OpenAI has a history that goes beyond the legal action, with disputes about the company's business approach and its connection with Microsoft. Musk, who was a part of the founding team of OpenAI, has expressed dissatisfaction with the path the company has taken.
OpenAI shared in a blog post that Musk had earlier proposed merging the organization with his car company, Tesla Inc. The document also hinted that Musk was in favor of OpenAI functioning as a profit-making business, but only if he was in charge. OpenAI's legal department alleged that Musk was trying to profit from the company's technological advancements for his personal gain.
The continuing conflict between Musk and OpenAI brings up substantial concerns about AI security and availability, reaching further than just the technology sector. Vinod Khosla, a billionaire investor and supporter of OpenAI, chimed in, implying that Musk's legal action wouldn't result in the creation of a broadly intelligent AI via legal routes.
The filing by OpenAI expressed apprehension that Musk could exploit the lawsuit to obtain the firm's confidential data and tech via pretrial discovery. As a safety measure, the company asked the court to classify the case as "complex" due to its complicated technical aspect and the possible engagement of several parties and claims.
(Sourced from various agencies)
Search for us on YouTube
Featured Programmes
Associated Articles
OpenAI's Sora has the capability to produce convincing nude videos, with developers hurriedly working on a solution
Musk defends his ketamine usage as beneficial for investors: Understanding this drug and its safety level
Musk confesses to using Ketamine to steer clear of 'negativity', asserting it's advantageous for Tesla investors
A study reveals that hackers can effortlessly intercept your conversations with ChatGPT and other AI platforms
OpenAI's Sora has the capability to produce convincing nude videos, with developers hurriedly working on a solution
Musk defends his ketamine usage as beneficial for investors: Understanding this drug and its safety level
Musk confesses to using Ketamine to steer clear of 'negativity', asserting it's advantageous for Tesla investors
A study reveals that hackers can effortlessly intercept your conversations with ChatGPT and other AI platforms
can be found on YouTube
Firstpost holds all rights and protections under copyright law, effective until 202
+ There are no comments
Add yours