Activities
Divisions
Performances
Activities
Divisions
Performances
'Elon Musk is irrational, delusional': OpenAI counters former investor's legal action
In reaction to the legal suit filed by Elon Musk, OpenAI has argued that it is rooted in a fabricated, complex, and frequently irrational set of facts. OpenAI also mentioned in the documents that Musk could potentially use the lawsuit to access the company's confidential records and technology during pretrial investigation.
OpenAI has firmly denied Elon Musk's accusations in a legal document, stating that his allegations are based on complex and frequently disjointed facts. This marks the first legal rebuttal from the company to Musk's lawsuit filed in February, as reported by CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman.
Musk's legal action alleges that OpenAI strayed from its original purpose of creating accountable artificial intelligence, becoming excessively swayed by its main investor, Microsoft Corporation. In response, OpenAI stated in its legal documents that it didn't violate any contract with Musk as there was no initial or any kind of agreement with him.
The submission also dismissed Musk's assertions made in a staff memo and a recent blog article. OpenAI depicted Musk's sought-after resolution as exceptional and grounded on an imaginary agreement. The firm contended that Musk's intention was to force OpenAI to restructure and share its technology based on his envisioned conditions.
The dispute between Musk and OpenAI has its roots before the lawsuit and is mainly about differences in opinions concerning the company's business approach and its ties with Microsoft. Musk, who was originally a part of the founding team at OpenAI, has expressed dissatisfaction with the company's trajectory.
OpenAI's blog post disclosed that Musk had earlier proposed merging the company with Tesla Inc., his car business. The document also hinted that Musk was in favor of OpenAI functioning as a profit-oriented organization, but only if he was in charge. OpenAI's lawyers blamed Musk for trying to profit from the company's tech advancements for his personal gain.
The continuing disagreement between Musk and OpenAI sparks crucial debates about the safety and availability of AI, going beyond the boundaries of the tech sector. Vinod Khosla, a billionaire investor in OpenAI, chimed in, implying that Musk's legal action wouldn't result in the creation of artificial general intelligence via legal routes.
OpenAI expressed in the legal document that they worry Musk could exploit the lawsuit to procure their confidential data and technology via pretrial discovery. To safeguard themselves, they asked the court to label the case as "complex" due to its technically complicated nature and possible engagement of several parties and allegations.
(Incorporating information from various sources)
Look for us on YouTube
Highlighted Shows
Associated News
OpenAI's Sora has the ability to create convincing nude videos, with developers swiftly working on a solution.
Musk defends his use of ketamine as beneficial for shareholders: What exactly is this substance and what are its safety levels?
Musk confesses to using Ketamine to fend off 'negativity', asserts that it's advantageous for Tesla shareholders.
Research finds that hackers can readily access your conversations with ChatGPT and other AI platforms.
OpenAI's Sora has the capability to produce authentic-looking explicit videos, with developers rapidly seeking a solution.
Musk maintains that his ketamine use is beneficial for shareholders: What is the nature of this substance and how safe is it?
Musk acknowledges using Ketamine to sidestep 'negativity', professes it's favorable for Tesla investors.
A study reveals that hackers can effortlessly intercept what you communicate to ChatGPT, as well as other AI systems.
is available on YouTube.
Firstpost holds exclusive rights, reserved until 2024.
+ There are no comments
Add yours