Events
Categories
Performances
Events
Categories
Performances
'Elon Musk is irrational, deluded': OpenAI refutes former investor's legal suit
Responding to Elon Musk's lawsuit, OpenAI contends that the basis for this lawsuit is a fabricated, complex, and frequently irrational set of facts. OpenAI also mentioned in their legal documents that Musk could potentially use the lawsuit to gain access to the company's confidential records and technology during the pretrial investigation.
OpenAI has firmly denied Elon Musk's accusations in a legal document, characterizing his assertions as based on confusing and frequently inconsistent factual bases. This reaction signifies the company's initial legal response to Musk's lawsuit filed in February, as stated by CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman.
Musk claimed in his legal battle that OpenAI had strayed from its original goal of creating ethical AI, becoming excessively swayed by its main backer, Microsoft Corporation. In response, OpenAI stated in their legal documents that they hadn't violated any contract with Musk, as there wasn't any foundational or any sort of agreement with him to begin with.
The submission also dismissed Musk's assertions in an internal memo and a recent blog post. OpenAI described Musk's requested solution as exceptional and grounded in an imaginary agreement. The firm contended that Musk's goal was to force OpenAI to restructure and share its technology per his envisioned conditions.
The dispute between Musk and OpenAI has a history that goes beyond the lawsuit, centering on differences over the company's approach to business and its ties with Microsoft. Musk, who was a part of the original team that started OpenAI, has expressed his dissatisfaction with the company's trajectory.
OpenAI disclosed in a blog post that Musk had earlier suggested merging the company with his car manufacturing company, Tesla Inc. The document also hinted that Musk was in favor of OpenAI functioning as a profit-making organization, but only if he was in charge. OpenAI's legal department alleged that Musk aimed to profit from the company's tech advancements for his personal gain.
The persistent conflict between Musk and OpenAI brings about crucial concerns regarding the safety and availability of AI, reaching further than just the technology sector. Vinod Khosla, a billionaire entrepreneur and an investor in OpenAI, offered his opinion, implying that Musk's legal action would not contribute to the advancement of artificial general intelligence via lawful routes.
OpenAI indicated in their legal documents that they fear Musk may exploit the lawsuit to get his hands on the firm's confidential documents and tech via the pretrial discovery process. To safeguard against this, the company asked the court to classify the case as "complex" due to its sophisticated technical aspects and the possible participation of numerous parties and allegations.
(Incorporating information from various sources)
Look for us on YouTube
Highlighted Programs
Associated Articles
OpenAI's Sora can create convincing naked videos, with developers quickly working on a solution
Musk confirms his use of ketamine is beneficial for shareholders: What is this substance and how secure is it?
Musk discloses using Ketamine to steer clear of 'negativity', suggests advantages for Tesla shareholders
Study finds that messages shared with ChatGPT and other AI services can easily be intercepted by hackers
OpenAI's Sora has the ability to create convincing naked videos, with developers swiftly working on a remedy
Musk insists his use of ketamine is in the best interest of investors: What is this substance and is it safe?
Musk confesses to Ketamine usage to avoid 'negativity', implying it is advantageous for Tesla shareholders
It has been discovered through a study that hackers can effortlessly access what you share with ChatGPT and other AI platforms
Can be found on YouTube.
Firstpost retains all rights as of 2024.
+ There are no comments
Add yours