Happenings
Divisions
Programs
Happenings
Divisions
Programs
Meta, Microsoft, and X are collaborating to oppose Apple's initiative to allow App Store to accept other external payment methods
Meta Platforms Inc, Microsoft Corporation, X Corporation, and Match Group Inc collectively appealed to a federal judge to reject Apple's proposed initiative to make its App Store accessible to outside payment methods.
Meta Platforms Inc, Microsoft Corp, X Corp, and Match Group Inc have collectively appealed to a federal judge to reject Apple's proposed scheme of allowing external payment options on its App Store.
In a unique joint submission, the firms contended that Apple's proposed plan does not comply with the 2021 verdict, which deemed the iPhone maker guilty of breaching California's unfair business practices regulations. The judgement required Apple to allow app developers to guide users towards their personal payment mechanisms.
The companies highlighted parallels with the points made by Epic Games Inc in its continuous anti-monopoly conflict with Apple. They claimed that Apple's strategy places additional restrictions on app creators, obstructing the competitive environment that the court order intended to nurture.
This joined submission is the most recent step in the continual disagreement about Apple's strict supervision of its app store, a leading platform globally, on par with Alphabet Inc.'s Google Play.
In 2021, a trial judge in Oakland ruled that Apple's business model broke California law by limiting developers' ability to discuss other payment systems, which could lead to increased expenses for consumers. This decision was supported by an appeals court last year. Apple imposes a fee on every transaction made via its app store.
Although both Epic and Apple requested the Supreme Court to reassess the decisions made by the lower courts, the Supreme Court refused to do so in January. Following this, Apple revealed plans to permit all third-party apps sold in the US to contain a link to the developer's website for handling in-app payments. Nevertheless, Epic has recently claimed that Apple is in violation of the court's order, arguing that the company has made external links financially unviable by introducing new charges.
Apple's suggested strategy, which extends over nine pages and consists of 2,900 words, details a variety of conditions and limitations for developers who want to include an external buying link in their applications, as per the submission from Meta, Microsoft, X, and Match.
Apple asserts that it is adhering to the court's decision while also protecting the privacy and security of its app store users. However, it persists in its attempt to gain a portion of the income from developers who choose not to use the system, with percentages varying between 12 and 27.
The continuous legal battle between Apple and several technology magnates highlights the intricate issues tied to app marketplace control and the wider effects on competition and consumer options within the digital landscape.
(Incorporating information from various sources)
Look for us on YouTube
Featured Programs
Connected Articles
Apple has at last unveiled MM1, its combined AI model for the creation of text and images.
The forthcoming version of Apple Watch is set to include THIS long-anticipated feature.
Apple is becoming Wall Street's new Coca-Cola. Here's the reasoning.
Could there be Google AI in the iPhone? Apple might collaborate with Alphabet, utilizing Gemini AI to fuel its gadgets.
Apple has at last unveiled MM1, its combined AI model for the creation of text and images.
The forthcoming version of Apple Watch is set to include THIS long-anticipated feature.
Apple is becoming Wall Street's new Coca-Cola. Here's the reasoning.
Could there be Google AI in the iPhone? Apple might collaborate with Alphabet, utilizing Gemini AI to fuel its gadgets.
Available on YouTube.
Firstpost holds all rights, protected by copyright, as of 2024
+ There are no comments
Add yours