Happenings
Divisions
Programs
Happenings
Divisions
Programs
Following TikTok, the EU is set to probe US social media platforms regarding data confidentiality and AI protection measures
As the US contemplates banning TikTok or compelling ByteDance to divest its share, the EU could commence inquiries into the practices of American social media firms with respect to data security and AI defenses.
The US House of Representatives has recently approved a bill that could either prohibit TikTok or compel ByteDance, its parent company, to divest its shares in the social media platform. This could also place other social media platforms under the EU's examination, primarily concerning their handling of user data. Although TikTok is currently the main subject of investigation due to supposed connections with the Chinese government, it isn't the only one subject to global criticism.
In the last year, major technology companies such as Amazon, Meta (previously known as Facebook), Apple, and more have been involved in legal disputes concerning content regulation and data protection in both Europe and America.
This joint examination signifies the rise of a new regulatory agreement in Western countries, suggesting a move towards tighter supervision of the technology sector.
The European Union (EU) has taken steps against TikTok, initiating a probe in February regarding claims of the platform's inability to safeguard minors. This comes after a hefty penalty of $372 million was levied on TikTok by the EU for comparable infractions just half a year prior. According to the newly introduced Digital Services Act by the EU, potential fines as high as $800 million or 6% of its worldwide revenue could be imposed on TikTok.
Major elections are on the horizon in Europe and the United States this year, which could lead to notable shifts in how people interact online. This leads to uncertainty about what lies ahead for social media networks.
The renewed scrutiny on technology firms significantly intensifies the strain on TikTok and its parent firm, Bytedance. Even if the suggested TikTok prohibition gets the green light from the US Senate, Bytedance would have a five-month period to offload TikTok’s US business activities prior to encountering stricter actions.
Nonetheless, these decisions are prone to legal disputes, similar to past efforts by states such as Montana to impose prohibitions on TikTok, leading to conflicts regarding First Amendment rights. This changing legal atmosphere highlights a change in focus from safeguarding freedom of speech to emphasizing user safety, mirroring a global tendency towards increased regulatory supervision of internet platforms.
The Digital Services Act from the European Union is the most recent attempt in a line of worldwide rules designed to tackle issues related to internet security.
These rules, which impose more accountability on platforms, indicate a shift from previous internet laws. Back in the 1990s, laws that controlled online service providers, like Section 230 in the U.S., were centered on broadening the reach of First Amendment rights.
Recent incidents, such as the public backlash surrounding the Molly Russell investigation and US Senate inquiries into child abuse on the internet, have led authorities to underscore the importance of online safety and clarity. This change indicates a rising worry that platforms which value user growth over security can lead to substantial damage to users.
Countries beyond the European Union, such as the United States, Australia, Singapore, South Korea, and various Latin American countries, have recently implemented their own laws. This worldwide agreement indicates a substantial shift from past strategies and represents a collective endeavor to create more robust regulations for the protection of internet users.
Tech powerhouses such as Google, Amazon, Meta, Apple, and Microsoft, although extremely beneficial to local economies, are encountering heightened regulatory examination. The recent penalties set on Apple by EU's competition laws and the continuous implementation of GDPR show that regulators are becoming more resolute in making tech firms liable.
The European Commission has already begun to exert pressure on major tech firms such as Google, Facebook, and TikTok by asking for information on their handling of threats posed by generative artificial intelligence, like the widespread proliferation of deepfakes. In this regard, they have circulated questions about how eight platforms and search engines – encompassing Microsoft’s Bing, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, and the previously known Twitter, X – are mitigating the dangers of generative AI.
European users, who make up a substantial part of the user base and advertising income of social media platforms, play a crucial role in influencing regulatory reactions.
The changing dynamics between regulatory authorities and tech firms are marked by intricacy and mutual reliance. Even though there are increasing demands for regulatory restrictions on major tech companies, the prospects of outright prohibitions are still unclear. Both sides acknowledge the need for cooperation, as emphasized by remarks from individuals such as Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.
Users should anticipate alterations in internet functions and services, which may likely lean towards subscription-based models to counterbalance the expenses associated with adhering to regulations. These arrangements could favor consumers by enhancing their understanding of digital platforms and protecting their private information from being misused by companies reliant on advertising.
In this crucial year where technology and democracy converge, the continuing discourse between lawmakers and digital platforms is predicted to ramp up. The aim of this persistent conflict is to achieve clearer legal guidelines and a more secure online space. This promises a future where user security and internet safety are of utmost importance.
(Incorporating information from various sources)
Search for us on YouTube
Best Programs
Associated Narratives
can be found on YouTube
Firstpost owns all rights and protections under copyright law as of 2024
+ There are no comments
Add yours